Presentation of Misericordia Dei

PRESENTATION OF MISERICORDIA DEI

Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger

MISERICORDIA DEI on certain aspects of the celebration of the Sacrament of Penance

Cardinal Ratzinger noted that the Motu Proprio is a response to the improper use in some countries of general absolution to replace the personal confession of sins. General absolution is designed for emergency situations where penitents must also have the intention of making their confession afterward as soon as possible for the liceity of the general absolution. In recent years the extraordinary method of general absolution has been used as the normal method. This has the bad effect of bringing about an impersonalization of the guilt of personal sin and of the personal nature of forgiveness, in which God personally forgives the sinner and raises him/her to divine life. In his Apostolic Letter, the Holy Father underlines the personal character of confession and absolution, of our sins and of their forgiveness that the sacrament promotes in a special way more than other sacraments. In the Apostolic Letter, the Holy Father also teaches that the Church does not have the power to replace with general absolution the personal confession, that Christ required for the act of judgment that the priest's activity of binding or loosing entails. Here is a translation of Cardinal Ratzinger's presentation of the summary of the teaching of the Church.

The fact that humanity needs purification and forgiveness is something that is most evident at this historical moment. For this very reason the Holy Father in his Apostolic Letter NovoMillennio ineunte placed among the priorities of the mission of the Church for the new millennium "a renewed pastoral courage in proposing in an attractive and effective way the practice of the Sacrament of Reconciliation" (n. 37).

Personalist nature of Christian life

The new Motu Proprio Misericordia Dei is linked to this invitation and makes theologically, pastorally, and juridically concrete a few important aspects of the practice of this sacrament. Above all, the Motu Proprio emphasizes the personalist nature of the Sacrament of Penance: as the sin, despite all our bonds with the human community, is ultimately something totally personal, so also our healing with forgiveness has to be something that is totally personal. God does not treat us as part of a collectivity. He knows each one by name, he calls him/her personally and saves him if he has fallen into sin. Even if in all the sacraments, the Lord addresses the person as an individual, the personalist nature of the Christian life is manifested in a particularly clear way in the Sacrament of Penance. That means that the personal confession and the forgiveness directed to this person are constitutive parts of the sacrament. Collective absolution is an extraordinary form that is possible only in strictly determined cases of necessity; it also supposes, as something that belongs to the nature of the sacrament, the will to make the personal confession of sins, as soon as it will be possible to do so. The strongly personalist nature of the Sacrament of Penance was overshadowed in the last decade by the ever more frequent recourse to general absolution which was increasingly considered as a normal form of the Sacrament of Penance, an abuse that contributed to the gradual disappearance of this sacrament in some parts of the Church.

Trent understands that the power to forgive sins given to the Apostles and their successors requires a judgement

If the Pope now reduces again the extent of this possibility, the objection might be made: but has not the Sacrament of Penance undergone many transformations in history, why not this one? In this regard one needs to say that, in reality, the form manifests notable variations, but the personalist component was always essential.

The Church had and has the consciousness that only God can forgive sins (cf. Mk 2,7). For that reason she had to learn to discern carefully and almost with reverent awe what powers the Lord transmitted to her and which he did not. After a long journey of historical maturation, the Council of Trent expounded in an organic form the ecclesial doctrine on the Sacrament of Penance (DS 1667-1693; 1701-1715).

The Fathers of the Council of Trent understood the words of the Risen One to his disciples in Jn 20,22f as the specific words of the institution of the sacrament: "Receive the Holy Spirit, whose sins you shall forgive they are forgiven them, whose sins you shall retain, they are retained" (DS 1670; 1703; 1710). Starting with Jn 20 they interpreted Mt 16,19 and 18,18 and understood the power of the keys of the Church as the power for the remission of sins (DS 1692-1 1710). They were fully conscious of the problems of the interpretation of these texts and established their interpretation in terms of the Sacrament of Penance with the help of "the understanding of the Church" that is expressed in the universal consensus of the Fathers (1670; 1679; 1683; important for this 1703). The decisive point in these words of institution lies in the fact that the Lord entrusts to the disciples the choice between loosing and binding, retaining or forgiving: the disciples are not simply a neutral instrument of divine forgiveness, but rather a power of discernment is entrusted to them and with it a duty of discernment for individual cases. The Fathers saw in this the judicial nature of the sacrament. Two aspects belong essentially to the Sacrament of Penance: on the one hand the sacramental aspect, namely the mandate of the Lord, that goes beyond the real power of the disciples and of the community of disciples of the Church; on the other hand, the commission to make the decision that must be founded objectively and, therefore, must be just and in this sense has a judicial nature. "Jurisdiction" belongs to the sacrament and it requires a juridical order in the Church, that is always directed to the essence of the sacrament, to the saving will of God (1686f). Trent is clearly differing from the position of the Reformers, in which the Sacrament of Penance signifies only the manifestation of a forgiveness already granted through faith, and so does not do anything new, but only announces what always already exists in faith.

The judicial nature of the Sacrament implies the necessity to confess each mortal sin

This juridical-sacramental character of the sacrament has two important implications: if this is the reality, we must speak of a sacrament that is different from Baptism, of a specific sacrament, that supposes a special sacramental power, that is linked with the Sacrament of Orders (1684). If however, there is also a judicial evaluation, then it is clear that the judge has to know the facts of the case on which he is to judge. The necessity of the personal confession with the telling of the sins, for which one must ask pardon of God and of the Church because they have broken the unity of love with God that is given by baptism, is implicit in the juridical aspect. At this point the Council can say that it is necessary iuredivino (by divine law) to confess each and every mortal sin (can. 7, 1707). So the Council teaches that the duty of confession was instituted by the Lord himself and is constitutive of the sacrament, and so not left to the disposition of the Church.

Church does not have the power to replace personal confession with general absolution

Therefore it is not in the power of the Church to replace personal confession with general absolution: the Pope reminds us of this in the new Motu Proprio, thatexpresses theChurch's consciousness of the limits of her power; it expresses the bond with the word of the Lord that is binding even on the Pope. Only in situations of necessity, in which the human being's final salvation is at stake, can the absolution be anticipated and the confession left for a time in which it will be possible to make it. This is the true meaning of what in a rather obscure way is meant by the word collective absolution, Now it is also the mission of the Church to define when one is in the presence of such a situation of necessity. After, as we said, experiencing in the last decades expansive, and for many reasons unsustainable, interpretations of the conceptof necessity, in this document the Pope gives precise determinations that must be applied in their particulars by the Bishops.

Confession offers experience of liberation by God from the past weight of sins

Does this document place a new burden on the backs of Christians? It is precisely the contrary: the totally personal character of Christian life is defended. Of course, the confession of one's own sin can seem to be something heavy for the person, because it humbles his pride and confronts him with his poverty. It is this that we need: we suffer exactly for this reason: we shut ourselves up in our delirium of guiltlessness and for this reason we are closed to others and to any comparison with them. In psychotherapeutic treatments a person is made to bear the burden of profound and often dangerous revelations of his inner self. In the Sacrament of Penance, the simple confession of one's guilt is presented with confidence in God's merciful goodness. It is important to do this without failing into scruples, with the spirit of trust proper to the children of God. In this way confession can become an experience of deliverance, in which the weight of the past is removed from us and we can feel rejuvenated by the merit of the grace of God who each time gives back the youthfulness of the heart.  

Taken from:
L'Osservatore Romano
Weekly Edition in English
8 May 2002, page 5

L'Osservatore Romano is the newspaper of the Holy See.
The Weekly Edition in English is published for the US by:

The Cathedral Foundation
L'Osservatore Romano English Edition
320 Cathedral St.
Baltimore, MD 21201
Subscriptions: (410) 547-5315
Fax: (410) 332-1069
lormail@catholicreview.org