Category: SSPX/Rome

Petition of 700 Signatories/Families Delivered to Menzingen and Rome

Petition and Accompanying Letter Available Here [Google Translation] Our “letter of the faithful” has come to an end, thanks to you we have reached 696 signatures, thank you!  It is sent this day to Monsignor Fellay and to the Commission Ecclesia Dei.  You can read the letter that accompanied it below.  We have included your…


The Muzzled SSPX Has No Opinion

  The Muzzled SSPX Has No Opinion by Sean Johnson 6/21/17 It was only a couple weeks ago that we commented on Fr. Bouchacourt’s propaganda piece in the May/June Fideliter titled “As We Are” (Here), in which he stated: “This fighting spirit against errors, even if it is only a consequence of an unconditional attachment…


Delusional or Dishonest?

The following is the latest spin from the Neo-SSPX, still trying to pretend there have been no changes or compromises with modernist Rome, and that they continue to follow the path of Archbishop Lefebvre: We have ALWAYS had diocesan clergy perform the marriages in our chapels!  We have ALWAYS been at war with Eastasia!  For…


Regarding the Letter “Striking Contrast” (Part II)

Regarding the Letter “Striking Contrast” (Part II):  Response to an Anonymous Defender of Fr. Laisney by Sean Johnson March/2015 A few days after my rebuttal to Fr. Laisney’s letter “Striking Contrast” appeared on my original blog platform (Athanasius Contra Mundum), my stalker of 2 years made his first appearance attempting to run anonymous damage control…


SSPX/Ecclesia Dei Convergence: “Apostolicity”

SSPX/Ecclesia Dei Convergence By Sean Johnson August 24, 2014 When the 2007 reprint of Michael Davies’ classic became available from Angelus Press in 2007, it never occurred to me to question the purpose of the release. I presumed that Davies was augmenting his already solid work with additional argumentation and documentation. In fact, it was…


Response to an SSPX Priest (Part I)

Response to an SSPX Priest (Part I)  By Sean Johnson 10/31/15     Introduction: That which follows is a response to an SSPX priest regarding a recent conversation, in which were expressed some rather disturbing opinions.  Originally communicated in an email, it has been edited to preserve the priest’s anonymity, and slightly updated to allow…


Response to an SSPX Priest (Part II: Damage Control)

Response to an SSPX Priest (Part II): Damage Control By Sean Johnson January/2016 INTRODUCTION Shortly after my article, “Response to an SSPX Priest,” appeared on Cathinfo, it elicited an anonymous response from one writing under the pseudonym “Henry4.”1 As was the case with the anonymous response to my rebuttal of Fr. François Laisney’s letter, “Striking…


The SSPX and Doctrinal Pluralism

For the sake of brevity, I had originally intended to publish this article in a series of installments, the first of which appeared back on November 17, 2016.[i]  However, because of the passage of time, the interruption of the previous Sodalitium Pianum blog platform, and the widening scope of subject matter incorporated into the article…


The SSPX Marriage Affair: What’s It All About? (Part I)

by “Benoit Parvulus” May 19, 2017 http://medias-catholique.info/fsspx-l-affaire-des-mariages-de-quoi-sagit-il/7805 [Google Translation] On the 7th of May, a divergence appeared among the clergy of the Tradition. This dissension is beyond the scope of the SSPX alone, since the three superiors of the three communities usually used the sacred bishops of Bishop Lefebvre. The divergence, undoubtedly deep and ancient,…


Petition to Bishop Fellay and Ecclesia Dei Exceeds 500 Signatories (and Counting)

The following letter and petition appeared on Change.org on 5/13 as an initiative of French District SSPX laymen, in response to the Society’s scandalous acceptance of the “pastoral guidelines” regarding the subjugation of SSPX marriages to the authority of modernist/conciliar officials. Now extending well beyond the borders of the French District, the petition has received…